Module 5 - Choropleth Mapping

    This week, in the fifth Computer Cartography lab, was about Choropleth Mapping. 

    In this module we learned more about choropleth mapping and proportional symbology. These mapping methods give us more variety when mapping larger country and county areas as well as symbology that is tied to the locations. In this lab we used them to effectively map the population density of Europe as well as wine consumption per country. 

    The map below you can see a choropleth map of Europe. In this map I produced I used graduated symbology instead of proportional symbology. The reason for this is in part that the proportional symbology was harder to read than graduated. So, it felt like the best way to complete the map. 

    The map was made in ArcGIS, and the data was provided by UWF. In the map we first made sure to first make a choropleth map by taking the shapefile we were given and changing its symbology to graduated color. From there it was using classifications from last week’s lab to make the map look right. From there we made proportional and graduated symbology and chose which we preferred. Lastly, once we had everything we needed, we made the map in a new layout section and made sure it provided information on population density and wine consumed. 

    In closing this map reaffirmed what I had learned last week with classifications while also making a good choropleth map this week. I hope in the future two labs I can utilize what I learned more.



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

About me

Hi, my name is Reese LeForce, and I wanted to share a bit about myself. I currently work for the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) with concerns to Potable Water. I have also worked previously in the Stormwater department for a few years. I got into GIS to hopefully progress my career with the FDEP, and with the completion of the certificate, utilize GIS more within my work. Also, I may continue my education and get an environmental masters. Other than work, if I ever have the free time, I usually try and complete many of my ongoing projects of building model kits or finishing any games I have. I also try to make time to spend with friends and family whenever I can. I also have made a story map that goes a bit further in my past that I have linked  here . I hope you will engage with my blog and enjoy my GIS journey. 
Read more

Module 4 - Data Classification

Image
     This week, in the forth Computer Cartography lab, was about Data Classification.       In this module we used data classifications to differentiate our data. This involved using Equal Interval, Natural breaks, Quantile, and Standard Deviation classifications. With these classifications we are able to see the class distribution change with each map as well as learn what each one does. Equal Interval: groups data into equal grouped ranges that are uniform, however this provides errors due to masking clusters.  Natural breaks: groups data into natural groups where the data looks to have similarities in their clusters. Quantile: groups data similar to equal interval but equally distributes data into their category tracts, however this also conceals the data's true nature.  Standard Deviation: groups data on the deviation from the mean point of all of the data, this provides more errors if not normalized and also reads a bit harder.  ...
Read more

Module 1 - Fundamentals

Image
    This week, in the first Special Topics in Geographic Science lab, was about Fundamentals of data accuracy and precision.      In this classes lab we preformed analysis on a GPS data in order to determine how precise and accurate our data was to the reference points. As you can see in the map below we used the points given to make an average point which we used to make a precision buffer of 50, 68 and 90 percentiles. The 68 percentile is what we use for the majority of the lab but it does later lie close horizontally to our reference point.       For my horizontal accuracy, the distance was 3.25 m. For the horizontal precision, we got 4.4 m. Between these two sets of data we know that out data is accurate with as our reference points lies within out horizontal precision, but due to the rest of our waypoints being farther away from each other does mean our precision is lacking.      Why this is is because with accuracy, ...
Read more